ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 40, Issue 3, 2003October 30, 2003 CDT
Officer and Director Bars: Who is Substantially Unfit to Serve After Sarbanes-Oxley?
Officer and Director Bars: Who is Substantially Unfit to Serve After Sarbanes-Oxley?
secsarbasecurities actsecurities exchange actsecurities fraudsecurities lawu.s. patent and trademark office
Articles in Vol. 40, Issue 3, 2003
Vol. 40, Issue 3, 2003
- PrologueCraig Joyce
- IntroductionJon Newman
- Misappropriation: A DirgeRichard Posner
- America's Cultural Record: A Thing of the Past?Laura Gasaway
- <i>Eldred</i>, The First Amendment, and Aggressive Copyright ClaimsAlfred Yen
- Freedom of Speech and Intellectual Property: Some Thoughts After <i>Eldred, 44 Liquormart, and Bartnicki</i>Eugene Volokh
- The United States and International Copyright Law: From Berne to <i>Eldred</i>William Patry
- Burn Berne: Why the Leading International Copyright Convention Must be RepealedAlan Story
- Digital Rights Management: Trafficking in Technology That Can be Used to Circumvent the Intellectual Property ClauseKristen Brown
- Officer and Director Bars: Who is ~~Substantially~~ Unfit to Serve After Sarbanes-Oxley?Michael Dailey
- Caught in a Corporate Panty Raid: <i>Mosely v. Secret Catalogue, Inc.</i>Susan Turcotte
Michael Dailey, Officer and Director Bars: Who Is <s>Substantially</S> Unfit to Serve After Sarbanes-Oxley?, 40 Hou. L. Rev. (2003).