Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Hous. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Comments
    • Copyright in Context Symposium
    • Criminal Justice Institute Symposia
    • Essays
    • Frankel Lecture Series
    • Health Law Symposium
    • Houston Law Review Online
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Spring Lectures
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Symposia
    • Lectures
    • Notes
    • Sondock Jurist-in-Residence Series
    • Symposium: School Violence, School Safety, and the Juvenile Justice System
    • Tributes
    • Voting Rights Symposium
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscriptions
  • For Students
  • Podcast
  • Houston Law Review Online
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://houstonlawreview.org/feed
×
Articles
Vol. 56, Issue 1, 2018October 17, 2018 CDT

Research Revolution or Status Quo?: The New Common Rule and Research Arising from Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing

Valerie Gutmann Koch, Kelly Todd,
revised common rule common rule biospecimens informed consent direct-to-consumer genetic testing consumer genomics
Photo by Ani Kolleshi on Unsplash
Hous. L. Rev.
Valerie Gutmann Koch & Kelly Todd, Research Revolution or Status Quo?: The New Common Rule and Research Arising from Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing, 56 Hous. L. Rev. 81 (2018).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system