ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 41, Issue 4, 2004November 17, 2003 CDT
Selective Constitutional Analysis in Lawrence v. Texas: An Exercise in Judicial Restraint or a Willingness to Reconsider Equal Protection Classification for Homosexuals?
Selective Constitutional Analysis in Lawrence v. Texas: An Exercise in Judicial Restraint or a Willingness to Reconsider Equal Protection Classification for Homosexuals?
Articles in Vol. 41, Issue 4, 2004
Vol. 41, Issue 4, 2004
- Negotiating Bankruptcy Legislation Through the News MediaMelissa B. Jacoby
- The Collection Due Process Rights: A Misstep or a Step in the Right Direction?Leslie Book
- In Praise of Statutes of Limitations in Sex Offense CasesJames Herbie DiFonzo
- Unsafe Verdicts: The Need for Reformed Standands for the Trial and Review of Factual Innocence ClaimsD. Michael Risinger
- The Yale L. Rosenberg Memorial Lecture: Taking Prosecutorial Ethics Seriously: A Consideration of the Prosecutor's Ethical Obligation to "Seek Justice" in a Comparative Analytical FrameworkSamuel J. Levine
- Playing Patriot Games: National Security Challenges Civil LibertiesJennifer M. Hannigan
- Selective Constitutional Analysis in <i>Lawrence v. Texas</i>: An Exercise in Judicial Restraint or a Willingness to Reconsider Equal Protection Classification for Homosexuals?Adrienne Butcher
- Filtering the First Amendment: The Constitutionality of Internet Filters in Public Libraries Under the Children's Internet Protection ActLarissa Piccardo
Adrienne Butcher, Selective Constitutional Analysis in Lawrence v. Texas: An Exercise in Judicial Restraint or a Willingness to Reconsider Equal Protection Classification for Homosexuals?, 41 Hou. L. Rev. (2003).