This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Hou. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Comments
    • Copyright in Context Symposium
    • Criminal Justice Institute Symposia
    • Essays
    • Frankel Lecture Series
    • Health Law Symposium
    • Houston Law Review Online
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Spring Lectures
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Symposia
    • Lectures
    • Notes
    • Sondock Jurist-in-Residence Series
    • Symposium: School Violence, School Safety, and the Juvenile Justice System
    • Tributes
    • Voting Rights Symposium
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscriptions
  • For Students
  • Podcast
  • Houston Law Review Online
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:8713/feed
ISSN 0018-6694
Comments
Vol. 41, Issue 2, 2004November 17, 2003 CDT

“Under God” Does Not Need to Be Placed Under Wraps: The Phrase “Under God” Used in the Pledge of Allegiance is Not an Impermissible Recognition of Religion

Walter Lynch,
religionestablishment clausefirst amendmentconstitutional lawpledge of allegiance
Photo by Goh Rhy Yan on Unsplash
Hou. L. Rev.
Walter Lynch, “Under God” Does Not Need to Be Placed Under Wraps: The Phrase “Under God” Used in the Pledge of Allegiance Is Not an Impermissible Recognition of Religion, 41 Hou. L. Rev. (2003).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system