ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 45, Issue 3, 2008September 20, 2008 CDT
An Empirical Analysis of the Length of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions
An Empirical Analysis of the Length of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions
Articles in Vol. 45, Issue 3, 2008
Vol. 45, Issue 3, 2008
- An Empirical Analysis of the Length of U.S. Supreme Court OpinionsRyan C. BlackJames F. Spriggs II
- Foreclosure Reform Amid Mortgage Lending Turmoil: A Public Purpose ApproachPrentiss Cox
- <i>Almendarez-Torres</i> and the <i>Anders<i> Ethical DilemmaBrent E. Newton
- Racial Disparities in the Capital of Capital PunishmentScott Phillips
- The Alien Invasion?Ediberto Román
- Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Abuse: Means Testing is Presumptive, but "Totality" is DeterminativeNed W. WaxmanJustin H. Rucki
- Reviewing Arbitration Awards in TexasJudge Gray H. MillerEmily Buchanan Buckles
- The Last Execution: Rethinking the Fundamentals of Death Penalty LawDavid R. Dow
- Why the <i>Target</i> "Nexus Test" Leave Disabled Americans Disconnected: A Better Approach to Determine Whether Private Commercial Websites Are "Places of Public Accommodation"Nikki D. Kessling
Ryan C. Black & James F. Spriggs II, An Empirical Analysis of the Length of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions, 45 Hou. L. Rev. (2008).