ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 37, Issue 4, 2000February 01, 2000 CDT
“Their Promises of Paradise”: Will Olmstead v. L.C. Resuscitate the Constitutional “Least Restrictive Alternative” Principle in Mental Disability Law?
“Their Promises of Paradise”: Will Olmstead v. L.C. Resuscitate the Constitutional “Least Restrictive Alternative” Principle in Mental Disability Law?
Articles in Vol. 37, Issue 4, 2000
Vol. 37, Issue 4, 2000
- Alden v. Maine: Rights Without RemediesRussell A. Chorush, Ph.D.
- From Barcelo to McCamish: A Call to Relax the Privity Barrier in the Estate-Planning Context in TexasJason D. Pinkall
- Dietary Supplements: Can the Law Control the Hype?Iona N. Kaiser
- The Americans with Disabilities Act and Managed CareMary R. AnderlikWendy J. Wilkinson
- Access to Health Care for Individuals with Hearing ImpairmentsBonnie Poitras Tucker
- HIV, the ADA, and the Duty to TreatLois Shepherd
- "Their Promises of Paradise": Will Olmstead v. L.C. Resuscitate the Constitutional "Least Restrictive Alternative" Principle in Mental Disability Law?Michael L. Perlin
- Reflections on the Americans with Disability ActDick Thornburgh
- Celebrating the Tenth Anniversary of the Americans with Disability ActLaura F. Rothstein
Michael L. Perlin, “Their Promises of Paradise”: Will Olmstead v. L.C. Resuscitate the Constitutional “Least Restrictive Alternative” Principle in Mental Disability Law?, 37 Hou. L. Rev. (2000).