ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 40, Issue 5, 2004February 24, 2004 CDT
“That Isn’t Fair, Judge”: The Costs of Using Prior Juvenile Delinquency Adjudications in Criminal Court Sentencing
“That Isn’t Fair, Judge”: The Costs of Using Prior Juvenile Delinquency Adjudications in Criminal Court Sentencing
Articles in Vol. 40, Issue 5, 2004
Vol. 40, Issue 5, 2004
- What Do Patent's Purchase? In Search of Optimal Ignorance in the Patent OfficeShubha GhoshJay Kesan
- Let's Make it Official: Adding An Explicit Preplan Sale Process as an Alternative Exit from BankruptcyGeorge W. Kuney
- "That Isn't Fair, Judge": The Costs of Using Prior Juvenile Delinquency Adjudications in Criminal Court SentencingEllen Marrus
- Does the Death Penalty, by Risking Execution of the Innocent, Violate Substantive Due Process?Ursula Bentele
- The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: A Successful Model or a Legal Anamoly Vulnerable to AttackBrian Boyle
- Applying the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing to FranchisesJoel Iglesias
- Foreign Corporations and the Issue of Consent to Jurisdiction Through Registration to do Business in Texas: Analysis and ProposalMark Schuck
Ellen Marrus, “That Isn’t Fair, Judge”: The Costs of Using Prior Juvenile Delinquency Adjudications in Criminal Court Sentencing, 40 Hou. L. Rev. (2004).