Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Hous. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Comments
    • Copyright in Context Symposium
    • Criminal Justice Institute Symposia
    • Essays
    • Frankel Lecture Series
    • Health Law Symposium
    • Houston Law Review Online
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Spring Lectures
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Symposia
    • Lectures
    • Notes
    • Sondock Jurist-in-Residence Series
    • Symposium: School Violence, School Safety, and the Juvenile Justice System
    • Tributes
    • Voting Rights Symposium
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscriptions
  • For Students
  • Podcast
  • Houston Law Review Online
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://houstonlawreview.org/feed
×
Notes
Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2002February 14, 2003 CDT

Supreme Court “Just Says No” to Medical Marijuana: A Look at United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Cooperative

Cathryn L. Blaine,
state law necessity marijuana medical csa controlled substances act oakland cannabis buyers' cooperative medical marijuana
Photo by chuttersnap on Unsplash
Hous. L. Rev.
Cathryn L. Blaine, Supreme Court “Just Says No” to Medical Marijuana: A Look at <i>United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Cooperative</i>, 39 Hous. L. Rev. (2003).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system