ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 46, Issue 5, 2010February 11, 2010 CDT
You Pay for What You Get: The Argument for Allowing Parties to Contract Around Patent Exhaustion
You Pay for What You Get: The Argument for Allowing Parties to Contract Around Patent Exhaustion
Articles in Vol. 46, Issue 5, 2010
Vol. 46, Issue 5, 2010
- Summary Judgments in Texas: State and Federal PracticeJudge David HittnerLynne Liberato
- The Celebrity CEO: Corporate Disclosure at the Intersection of Privacy and Securities LawPatricia Sánchez AbrilAnn M. Olazábal
- The Unconstitutional Denial of a Texas Veterans BenefitMatthew B. Allen
- Keys to the Kingdom: The Need for Judicial Reform of Contractual Sovereign Immunity in TexasCaren DeLuccio
- Exposing a Gap in CERCLA Case Law: Is There a Right to Recover Costs Following Compliance with an Administrative Order After _Atlantic_ and _Aviall_?Aselda Thompson
- You Pay for What You Get: The Argument for Allowing Parties to Contract Around Patent ExhaustionJared Tong
Jared Tong, You Pay for What You Get: The Argument for Allowing Parties to Contract Around Patent Exhaustion, 46 Hou. L. Rev. (2010).