Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Hous. L. Rev.
Menu
Articles
Articles
Books
Comments
Copyright in Context Symposium
Criminal Justice Institute Symposia
Essays
Frankel Lecture Series
Health Law Symposium
Houston Law Review Online
Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Spring Lectures
Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Symposia
Lectures
Notes
Sondock Jurist-in-Residence Series
Symposium: School Violence, School Safety, and the Juvenile Justice System
Tributes
Voting Rights Symposium
All
For Authors
Editorial Board
About
Issues
Blog
Subscriptions
For Students
Podcast
Houston Law Review Online
search
Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
×
Articles
Blog posts
RSS Feed
Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.
https://houstonlawreview.org/feed
×
Comments
Vol. 46, Issue 5, 2010
February 11, 2010 CDT
You Pay for What You Get: The Argument for Allowing Parties to Contract Around Patent Exhaustion
Jared Tong
,
contract law
patent exhaustion
patent law
Photo by
Pietro Jeng
on
Unsplash
Hous. L. Rev.
Jared Tong,
You Pay for What You Get: The Argument for Allowing Parties to Contract Around Patent Exhaustion
, 46
Hous. L. Rev.
(2010).
Save article as...
▾
PDF
XML
Citation (BibTeX)
View more stats