Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Hous. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Comments
    • Copyright in Context Symposium
    • Criminal Justice Institute Symposia
    • Essays
    • Frankel Lecture Series
    • Health Law Symposium
    • Houston Law Review Online
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Spring Lectures
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Symposia
    • Lectures
    • Notes
    • Sondock Jurist-in-Residence Series
    • Symposium: School Violence, School Safety, and the Juvenile Justice System
    • Tributes
    • Voting Rights Symposium
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscriptions
  • For Students
  • Podcast
  • Houston Law Review Online
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://houstonlawreview.org/feed
×
Comments
Vol. 46, Issue 5, 2010February 11, 2010 CDT

You Pay for What You Get: The Argument for Allowing Parties to Contract Around Patent Exhaustion

Jared Tong,
contract law patent exhaustion patent law
Photo by Pietro Jeng on Unsplash
Hous. L. Rev.
Jared Tong, You Pay for What You Get: The Argument for Allowing Parties to Contract Around Patent Exhaustion, 46 Hous. L. Rev. (2010).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system