ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 39, Issue 2, 2002June 03, 2002 CDT
And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: How Classical Scientific Fallacies Undermine the Validity of Textualism and Originalism
And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: How Classical Scientific Fallacies Undermine the Validity of Textualism and Originalism
Articles in Vol. 39, Issue 2, 2002
Vol. 39, Issue 2, 2002
- Institutional Liability for Hazing in Interscholastic SportsScott R. RosnerR. Brian Crow
- Globalization of U.S. Law Enforcement: Does the Constitution Come Along?Frank Tuerkheimer
- Warranties by Beneficiaries of Letters of Credit Under Revised Article 5 of the UCC: The Truth and Nothing But the TruthRichard F. Dole, Jr.
- <i>Daubert</i> Objections to Public Records: Who Bears the Burden of Proof?Harvey Brown
- Give Me a Line in a U.S. Supreme Court Opinion or in Official Commentary to the Rules of Evidence for Admissibility of Experts in Court, and I Will Move the [Legal] WorldDavid S. Caudill
- From Conservative Republican to Liberal Democrat: A Political JourneySidney Buchanan
- And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: How Classical Scientific Fallacies Undermine the Validity of Textualism and OriginalismDaniel S. Goldberg
- Treasury Regulation § 301.6111-2T and the Economic Substance Doctrine: A Plea for Certainty in the Tax LawStewart Patton
- Infanticide or Civil Rights for Women: Did the Supreme Court Go Too Far in <i>Stenberg v. Carhart</i>?Stephanie D. Schmutz
Daniel S. Goldberg, And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: How Classical Scientific Fallacies Undermine the Validity of Textualism and Originalism, 39 Hou. L. Rev. (2002).