Skip to main content
null
Hous. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Comments
    • Copyright in Context Symposium
    • Criminal Justice Institute Symposia
    • Essays
    • Frankel Lecture Series
    • Health Law Symposium
    • Houston Law Review Online
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Spring Lectures
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Symposia
    • Lectures
    • Notes
    • Sondock Jurist-in-Residence Series
    • Symposium: School Violence, School Safety, and the Juvenile Justice System
    • Tributes
    • Voting Rights Symposium
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscriptions
  • For Students
  • Podcast
  • Houston Law Review Online
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:28157/feed
Notes
Vol. 47, Issue 4, 2010December 23, 2010 CDT

What’s so Improper About Improper Revival? Infringement Defenses After Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology

Andrew Ward,
infringement defensesimproper revival
Hous. L. Rev.
Andrew Ward, What’s so Improper About Improper Revival? Infringement Defenses After Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology, 47 Hous. L. Rev. (2010).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system