Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Hous. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Comments
    • Copyright in Context Symposium
    • Criminal Justice Institute Symposia
    • Essays
    • Frankel Lecture Series
    • Health Law Symposium
    • Houston Law Review Online
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Spring Lectures
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Symposia
    • Lectures
    • Notes
    • Sondock Jurist-in-Residence Series
    • Symposium: School Violence, School Safety, and the Juvenile Justice System
    • Tributes
    • Voting Rights Symposium
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscriptions
  • For Students
  • Podcast
  • Houston Law Review Online
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://houstonlawreview.org/feed
×
Notes
Vol. 47, Issue 4, 2010December 23, 2010 CDT

What’s so Improper About Improper Revival? Infringement Defenses After Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology

Andrew Ward,
infringement defenses improper revival
Hous. L. Rev.
Andrew Ward, What’s so Improper About Improper Revival? Infringement Defenses After Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology, 47 Hous. L. Rev. (2010).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system