ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 47, Issue 4, 2010December 23, 2010 CDT
Weaseling Out of the Deal: Why Buyers Should be Able to Invoke Material Adverse Change Clauses in the Wake of a Credit Crunch
Weaseling Out of the Deal: Why Buyers Should be Able to Invoke Material Adverse Change Clauses in the Wake of a Credit Crunch
Articles in Vol. 47, Issue 4, 2010
Vol. 47, Issue 4, 2010
- Prologue | The Statute of Anne: Yesterday and TodayCraig Joyce
- The Statute of Anne and the Great Abridgement SwindleRonan Deazley
- The Statute of Anne: Rhetoric and Reception in the Nineteenth CenturyCatherine Seville
- The Statute of Anne: An American MythologyOren Bracha
- Queen Anne in the Emperor's ShadowDavid Nimmer
- The Statute of Anne and Its Progeny: Variations Without a ThemeDiane Leenheer Zimmerman
- Epilogue | The Statute of Anne: Today and TomorrowCraig JoycePeter JasziMarshall LeafferTyler Ochoa
- Understanding the RAND CommitmentDoug Lichtman
- Weaseling Out of the Deal: Why Buyers Should be Able to Invoke Material Adverse Change Clauses in the Wake of a Credit CrunchDaniel Gottschalk
- The Alien Tort Statute and Customary International Law: The Judicial Albatross Hanging Around the Executive's NeckJonathan B. Lancton
- What's so Improper About Improper Revival? Infringement Defenses After <i>Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology</i>Andrew Ward
Daniel Gottschalk, Weaseling Out of the Deal: Why Buyers Should Be Able to Invoke Material Adverse Change Clauses in the Wake of a Credit Crunch, 47 Hou. L. Rev. (2010).