ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 48, Issue 1, 2011April 11, 2011 CDT
Wyeth v. Levine: FDA Attempt to Preempt Common Law Claims Deemed Procedurally Deficient but Sets the Stage for Future Consideration of Substantive Sufficency
Wyeth v. Levine: FDA Attempt to Preempt Common Law Claims Deemed Procedurally Deficient but Sets the Stage for Future Consideration of Substantive Sufficency
Articles in Vol. 48, Issue 1, 2011
Vol. 48, Issue 1, 2011
- <i>Retaking Rationality</i> Two Years LaterMichael A. LivermoreRichard L. Revesz
- Politics by Other Meanings: A Comment on "<i>Retaking Rationality</i> Two Years Later"Douglas A. Kysar
- Rationality or Rationalism? The Positive and Normative Flaws of Cost-Benefit AnalysisAlexander Volokh
- Alien Tort Reform: A Proposal to Revise the Alien Tort StatuteDaniel Swearingen
- Extraterritorial Software Protection Under § 271(F): A Call to Congress to Fix a Statute that Was Not BrokenCraig E. Walter
- <i>Wyeth v. Levine</i>: FDA Attempt to Preempt Common Law Claims Deemed Procedurally Deficient but Sets the Stage for Future Consideration of Substantive SufficencyRachael C. Casey
Rachael C. Casey, Wyeth v. Levine: FDA Attempt to Preempt Common Law Claims Deemed Procedurally Deficient but Sets the Stage for Future Consideration of Substantive Sufficency, 48 Hou. L. Rev. (2011).