ISSN 0018-6694
Vol. 51, Issue 5, 2014April 19, 2014 CDT
Why so Serious? Taking the Word “Seriously” More Seriously in Plain Error Review of Federal Sentencing Appeals
Why so Serious? Taking the Word “Seriously” More Seriously in Plain Error Review of Federal Sentencing Appeals
Articles in Vol. 51, Issue 5, 2014
Vol. 51, Issue 5, 2014
- Introduction: Federal Sentencing Challenges Post-BookerDouglas A. Berman
- The Relevance of Offender Characteristics in a Guideline SystemJudge William K. Sessions III
- Dead Law Walking: The Surprising Tenacity of the Federal Sentencing GuidelinesFrank O. Bowman III
- Prison-By-Default: Challenging the Federal Sentencing Policy's Presumption of IncarcerationMelissa Hamilton
- A Critical View of the Sentencing Commission's Recent Recommendations to "Strengthen the Guidelines System"Carissa Byrne Hessick
- Why Federal Prosecutors Charge: A Comparison of Federal and New York State Arson and Robbery Filings, 2006–2010Susan R. KleinMichael GramerDaniel Graver
- Why so Serious? Taking the Word "Seriously" More Seriously in Plain Error Review of Federal Sentencing AppealsEdward Goolsby
- From Pioneer to Punisher: America's Quest to Find Its Juvenile Justice IdentityPatrick N. McMillin
- Optimal Deterrence: A Law and Economics Assessment of Sex and Labor Trafficking Law in the United StatesJessica E. Schaffner
Edward Goolsby, Why so Serious? Taking the Word “Seriously” More Seriously in Plain Error Review of Federal Sentencing Appeals, 51 Hou. L. Rev. (2014).