Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Hous. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Comments
    • Copyright in Context Symposium
    • Criminal Justice Institute Symposia
    • Essays
    • Frankel Lecture Series
    • Health Law Symposium
    • Houston Law Review Online
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Spring Lectures
    • Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law (IPIL) Symposia
    • Lectures
    • Notes
    • Sondock Jurist-in-Residence Series
    • Symposium: School Violence, School Safety, and the Juvenile Justice System
    • Tributes
    • Voting Rights Symposium
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscriptions
  • For Students
  • Podcast
  • Houston Law Review Online
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://houstonlawreview.org/feed
×
Notes
Vol. 37, Issue 2, 2000June 18, 2000 CDT

The Politics of Art and the Irony of Politics: How the Supreme Court, Congress, The NEA, and Karen Finley Misunderstand Art and Law in National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley

Neil Patten,
first amendment art politics
Hous. L. Rev.
Neil Patten, The Politics of Art and the Irony of Politics: How the Supreme Court, Congress, The NEA, and Karen Finley Misunderstand Art and Law in National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 37 Hous. L. Rev. (2000).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system